[Event "Moscow International-01"]
[Site "Moscow"]
[Date "1925.11.19"]
[Round "8"]
[White "Bohatirchuk, Fedor Parfenovich"]
[Black "Capablanca, Jose Raul"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "B85"]
[Annotator "Tactical Analysis 4.1 (180s)"]
[PlyCount "56"]
[EventDate "1925.11.10"]
[EventType "tourn"]
[EventRounds "21"]
[EventCountry "URS"]
[SourceTitle "HCL"]
[Source "ChessBase"]
[SourceDate "1999.07.01"]
[SourceVersion "2"]
[SourceVersionDate "1999.07.01"]
[SourceQuality "1"]
{Analizada y repasada por Stockfish 14.} 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4
Nf6 5. Nc3 d6 6. Be2 e6 7. O-O Be7 8. Be3 O-O 9. f4 Bd7 {[#]} 10. Nb3 $146 ({
Predecessor:} 10. Qd2 Qb8 (10... a6 11. h3 Qc7 12. Nf3 Rac8 13. Rfd1 Rfd8 14.
a3 Na5 15. Qd4 d5 16. Qb6 dxe4 17. Qxc7 Rxc7 18. Ne5 Be8 19. Bb6 Bc5+ 20. Bxc5
Rxd1+ 21. Rxd1 Rxc5 22. Rd8 Kf8 23. g4 Ke7 24. Rd4 Nc6 25. Nxc6+ Bxc6 26. g5
Nd5 27. Nxd5+ Rxd5 28. Rb4 Rf5 29. Kf2 e5 30. Rc4 exf4 31. h4 e3+ 32. Ke1 f3
33. Bd3 f2+ 34. Kf1 Rf3 35. Rxc6 bxc6 36. Kg2 Rf4 37. Bxa6 Rg4+ {0-1 (37) Van
Hartingsvelt,H-Euwe,M, Amsterdam VAS Winter 1922/23 (11) 01.1923}) 11. Nb3 Rd8
12. Rad1 Be8 13. Bf3 Nd7 14. Qf2 a6 15. Rd2 Qc7 16. Rfd1 Rab8 17. a4 b6 18. Be2
Ra8 19. Qf1 Qb7 20. Nd4 Nc5 21. Nf3 Nb4 22. e5 d5 23. Ra1 Ne4 24. Nxe4 dxe4 25.
Nd4 Nd5 26. Qf2 b5 27. axb5 axb5 28. Rxa8 Rxa8 29. Nb3 Nxe3 30. Qxe3 Bc6 {
½-½ (30) Ilyin Zhenevsky,A-Saemisch,F Moscow International-01 (4) 13.11.1925}
) 10... a6 11. a4 Na5 12. Qe1 {B85: Sicilian Scheveningen: 6 Be2 a6, lines
with early Be3.} Nxb3 13. cxb3 Bc6 14. Bf3 $1 {The position is equal.} Qc7 15.
Rc1 Rac8 16. Qg3 (16. b4 Qd7 17. a5 $11) 16... Qa5 17. Rfd1 {[#]} (17. Qe1 $5 {
keeps the balance.} Rfe8 18. Nd5 Qxe1 19. Nxe7+ Rxe7 20. Rfxe1 $11) 17... d5 (
17... Qb4 $5 18. e5 Ne8 19. Rd3 $1 Bxf3 20. Qxf3 dxe5 21. fxe5 f6 22. Rd7 Rc7
23. Rxc7 Nxc7 24. Na2 Qxb3 25. Rxc7 fxe5 26. Nc1 Rxf3 27. Nxb3 Rxe3 28. Rxb7
Kf8 $15 {[#] pero difícil de ganar, como demuestra, a modo de ejemplo, el
siguiente enfrentamiento entre dos módulos informáticos punteros de la
actualidad, al nivel de juego de 40 jugadas en 1 hora, ¡sin finish!:} 29. Kf1
Re4 30. a5 Rf4+ 31. Ke2 Rc4 32. Kd3 Ra4 33. g3 e4+ 34. Ke2 Ke8 35. Rb6 Kf7 36.
Rxa6 Ra2 37. Ke3 Rxb2 38. Rb6 Rxh2 39. Kxe4 {[#] y el peón "a" pasado es
contrajuego suficiente para garantizar el empate:} Ra2 40. a6 Ra4+ 41. Kd3 e5
42. Nd2 Bg5 43. Kc3 Be3 44. Rc6 Bxd2+ 45. Kxd2 h5 46. Kc3 e4 47. Kb3 Ra5 48.
Kc3 Ra3+ 49. Kb2 Ra4 50. Kb3 Ra5 51. Kc2 Ra2+ 52. Kb3 Ra1 53. Kb2 Ra5 54. Kc3
Ra2 55. Kd4 Ra4+ 56. Ke3 Kg8 57. Re6 Kf7 58. Rc6 Kg8 59. Rb6 Kh7 60. Kf4 Ra3
61. Kxe4 Rxg3 $11 {[#] Tablebases de Lomonosov. ½-½ Fat Fritz 2-Stockfish 14
Tenerife 2021}) 18. exd5 $11 Bxd5 19. Bxd5 exd5 20. Bd4 Bc5 21. Qf2 Ng4 22. Qd2
Rfe8 {[#] ...Qb4 is the strong threat.} 23. Kh1 (23. h3 $1 Qb4 24. Kh1 $1 (24.
hxg4 $2 Bxd4+ 25. Qxd4 Re1+ {[%mdl 64] Pin} 26. Kh2 Qxd4 $19 {[%mdl 64] Pin})
24... Bxd4 25. Qxd4 Qxd4 26. Rxd4 Ne3 $11) 23... Qb4 {[#]} (23... Ne3 $5 24.
Bxc5 Qxc5 (24... Nxd1 $2 25. b4 $1 $18) 25. Re1 d4 26. Nb5 Nc2 $1 27. Rxe8+
Rxe8 28. Nxd4 $1 Qxd4 29. Qxc2 Qxf4 $15 {para el siempre optimista módulo
informático Stockfish 14, pero otra vez, con chances tablíferas.}) 24. Nxd5
$4 {[%mdl 8192]} (24. h3 Bxd4 25. Qxd4 Re1+ 26. Rxe1 Qxd4 27. Ne2 Rxc1 28. Rxc1
Qd1+ {[%mdl 64] Decoy} 29. Rxd1 Nf2+ {[%mdl 64] Double Attack} 30. Kg1 Nxd1 31.
Kf1 $11 {[#] y un ejemplo clarificador:} Nxb2 32. Nc1 Kf8 33. Ke2 Ke7 34. Kd2
d4 35. Kc2 d3+ 36. Nxd3 Nxd3 37. Kxd3 $11) (24. Bxc5 Rxc5 25. Qd4 Qxd4 26. Rxd4
Ne3 27. Kg1 $11) 24... Qxd4 $1 $19 {Black is clearly winning.} 25. Ne7+ Kf8 26.
Qxd4 Bxd4 27. Nxc8 Nf2+ {[%mdl 64] Double Attack} 28. Kg1 Nxd1+ {[%mdl 64] [#]
Discovered Attack. Weighted Error Value: White=0.91/Black=0.13} 0-1
